(This is section 5 of the World Beyond War white paper A Global Security System: An Alternative to War. Continue to preceding | following section.)
World War I was justified as the “war to end wars,” but war never brings peace. It may bring a temporary truce, a desire for revenge, and a new arms race until the next war.
In conventional terms, the failure rate of war is 50%–that is, one side always loses. But in realistic terms, even the so-called victors take terrible losses.
Losses of warnote10
War | Casualties |
World War II | Total – 50+ million; Russia (“victor”) – 20 million; US (“victor”) – 400,000+ |
Korean War | South Korea Military – 113,000; South Korea Civilian – 547,000; North Korea Military – 317,000; North Korea Civilian – 1,000,000; China – 460,000; US Military – 33,000+ |
Vietnam War | South Vietnam Military – 224,000; North Vietnamese Military and Viet Cong – 1,000,000; South Vietnamese Civilians – 1,500,000; North Vietnamese Civilians – 65,000; US Military 58,000+ |
Wherever war is fought people suffer major destruction of infrastructure and art treasures. Furthermore, in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, wars seem not to end, but to drag on without resolution for years and even decades without peace ever being achieved. Wars do not work. They create a state of perpetual war, or what some analysts are now calling “permawar.” In the last 120 years the world has suffered many wars as the following partial list indicates:
and various others including Japan versus China in 1937, long civil war in Colombia, and wars in the Congo, the Sudan, Ethiopia and Eritrea, the Arab-Israeli wars, Pakistan versus India, etc.
(Continue to preceding | following section.)
We want to hear from you! (Please share comments below)
How has this led you to think differently about alternatives to war?
What would you add, or change, or question about this?
What can you do to help more people understand about these alternatives to war?
How can you take action to make this alternative to war a reality?
Please share this material widely!
Related posts See other posts related to “Why is an Alternative Global Security System both Desirable and Necessary?”
See full table of contents for A Global Security System: An Alternative to War
Notes:
10. Number can vary greatly depending on source. The website Death Tolls for the Major Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century and the Costs of War Project were used to provide data for this table.(return to main article)
2 Responses
This is an idea whose time has come. We have all had enough of the death and suffering that war brings, and it’s time that we all started realizing there is nothing inevitable about global aggression. Wars can be prevented! Together we can accomplish this.
This page makes clear that we are no longer just talking about “war,” but about “perpetual war.” In my own anti-war activities, it has struck me that “it’s almost as if what SOMEONE is benefiting from is PERMAWAR!” (Now who might THAT be? http://joescarry.blogspot.com/2012/01/jaccuse-beneficiaries-of-permawar.html