“History,” Winston Churchill said, “will be kind to me, for I intend to write it myself.” He needn’t have bothered. He was one of the great mass murderers of the 20th century, yet is the only one, unlike Hitler and Stalin, to have escaped historical odium in the West.
By Shashi Tharoor, March 13, 2018, Portside.
“History,” Winston Churchill said, “will be kind to me, for I intend to write it myself.” He needn’t have bothered. He was one of the great mass murderers of the 20th century, yet is the only one, unlike Hitler and Stalin, to have escaped historical odium in the West. He has been crowned with a Nobel Prize (for literature, no less), and now, an actor portraying him (Gary Oldman) has been awarded an Oscar.
As Hollywood confirms, Churchill’s reputation (as what Harold Evans has called “the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization”) rests almost entirely on his stirring rhetoric and his talent for a fine phrase during World War II. “We shall not flag nor fail. We shall go on to the end. … We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. … We shall never surrender.” (The revisionist British historian John Charmley dismissed this as “sublime nonsense.”)
Words, in the end, are all that Churchill admirers can point to. His actions are another matter altogether.
During World War II, Churchill declared himself in favor of “terror bombing.” He wrote that he wanted “absolutely devastating, exterminating attacks by very heavy bombers.” Horrors such as the firebombing of Dresden were the result.
In the fight for Irish independence, Churchill, in his capacity as secretary of state for war and air, was one of the few British officials in favor of bombing Irish protesters, suggesting in 1920 that airplanes should use “machine-gun fire or bombs” to scatter them.
Dealing with unrest in Mesopotamia in 1921, as secretary of state for the colonies, Churchill acted as a war criminal: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilised tribes; it would spread a lively terror.” He ordered large-scale bombing of Mesopotamia, with an entire village wiped out in 45 minutes.
In Afghanistan, Churchill declared that the Pashtuns “needed to recognise the superiority of [the British] race” and that “all who resist will be killed without quarter.” He wrote: “We proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive devastation. … Every tribesman caught was speared or cut down at once.”
But the principal victims of Winston Churchill were the Indians — “a beastly people with a beastly religion,” as he charmingly called them. He wanted to use chemical weapons in India but was shot down by his cabinet colleagues, whom he criticized for their “squeamishness,” declaring that “the objections of the India Office to the use of gas against natives are unreasonable.”
Churchill’s beatification as an apostle of freedom seems all the more preposterous given his 1941 declaration that the Atlantic Charter’s principles would not apply to India and the colored colonies. He refused to see people of color as entitled to the same rights as himself. “Gandhi-ism and all it stands for,” he declared, “will, sooner or later, have to be grappled with and finally crushed.”
Thanks to Churchill, some 4 million Bengalis starved to death in a 1943 famine. Churchill ordered the diversion of food from starving Indian civilians to well-supplied British soldiers and even to top up European stockpiles in Greece and elsewhere. When reminded of the suffering of his Indian victims, his response was that the famine was their own fault, he said, for “breeding like rabbits.”
Madhusree Mukerjee’s searing account of Churchill’s role in the Bengal famine, “Churchill’s Secret War,” documents that while Indians starved, prices for foodgrains were inflated by British purchases and India’s own surplus grains were exported, while Australian ships laden with wheat were not allowed to unload their cargo at Calcutta (where the bodies of those who had died of starvation littered the streets). Instead, Churchill ordered that grain be shipped to storage depots in the Mediterranean and the Balkans to increase the buffer stocks for a possible future invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. European warehouses filled up as Bengalis died.
Many of us will remember Churchill as a war criminal and an enemy of decency and humanity, a blinkered imperialist untroubled by the oppression of non-white peoples. Ultimately, his great failure — his long darkest hour — was his constant effort to deny us freedom.
Shashi Tharoor is author of “Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India.” He chairs the Indian Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee.
3 Responses
Thank you for this post. I learn something each time I visit the website. I’m spreading the word about your organization via bumper sticker, t-shirts, and sharing info about your site with those I personally know.
Thank you!
Churchill bepleitte de inzet van gifgas. Hij verordonneerde de inzet van gifgas in Rusland nabij Archangelsk op onder andere het dorp Emptsa in 1919. Er zijn daarvoor voldoende bronnen. Ik verwijs naar Churchill’s Crusade. The British Invasion of Russia 1918-1920 by Clinford Kinvig . Gas warfare pp.128m 129, 183, 244, 245, 246, 258, 265
Winston Churchill war nicht nur unsagbar böse, sondern ein wahrer Teufel und Massenmörder.
1. Er erklärte ohne Grund Deutschland den Krieg ( Belgien war nur ein billiger Vorwand!) denn bereits am zweiten Tag des Krieges kappte ein englisches Kabelschiff das Atlantische Überseekabel um jede Verbindung zu kappen.
Deutschland hatte nie vor einen Krieg zu führen , denn der Munitionsvorrat war bereits Ende 1914 so gut wie verbraucht.
Nur die kluge Handlungsweise von Walter Rathenau bewahrte uns
davor ganz ohne Munition zu sein.
Der 1. Weltkrieg wurde nur von England vom Zaun gebrochen, weil Deutschland wirtschaftlich und wissenschaftlich zu stark geworden war ! ( Mehr Stahl als England und Frankreich zusammen!)
England hatte zuvor schon Ägypten und Indien ausgeplündert und die Buren bekämpft weil die zu viel Gold und Diamantenfelder hatten!
2. England erklärte nur Deutschland den Krieg für den Einfall in Polen , nicht jedoch Russland ( 18.09.1939 ! ) warum nicht?
Und warum war Polen nach dem Krieg kein freies Land.
Churchill war nur ein versoffener , depressiver und verfressener Mörder , Rassist und Menschenhasser .
Doch die Geschichte rächt sich jetzt, denn nun ist ein Inder Bürgermeister von London und einem Ägypter gehört nun das Kaufhaus Harrods in London.
Ich hasse nicht England oder die Engländer, aber ich verabscheue diesen Massenmörder . Er soll in der Hölle schmoren.
Das schlimme ist nur es gibt so viele deutsche Historiker die echte Speichelleckerischer sind und nicht in der Lage sind eine echte und wahre Biografie von diesem Schuft zu schreiben der nicht einen Deut besser als Hitler oder Stalin war und Roosevelt war nicht besser!
Wann, so frage ich mich lernen die Menschen, daß Krieg nie eine Lösung ist.
Und wenn wir heute Russland so verdammen und beschimpfen, hatte dann Hitler doch Recht? NEIN ….Russen sind keine Untermenschen, aber Engländer und Amerikaner auch keine Übermenschen.
G. Gärtner