By Tom H. Hastings
Kowa ya san cewa diflomasiyya ita ce hanya mafi rauni don magance tashe-tashen hankula da yakin basasa, takunkumi mai tsauri na gaba, kuma idan da gaske kuna son kawo karshen yakin basasa, kuyi hakuri, kuna bukatar sojoji.
To, kowa da kowa yana zaton wannan.
Ok, ba kowa da kowa.
Ya bayyana, wannan tsari na tasiri yana komawa baya. Masana kimiyya uku na siyasa sun gudanar da tarihi metastudy na duk wani yunkuri na neman yancin kai wanda ya yi kama ko ya zama yakin basasa tsakanin 1960-2005 wanda ya haifar da kudurin kwamitin sulhu na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya.
Sakamakon ya fito karara. Amfani da sojojin Majalisar Dinkin Duniya kusan ba shi da wani tasiri wajen dakatar da yakin basasa. Takunkumin ya fi kyau, amma yunƙurin diflomasiyya sun yi nasara fiye da kowane ɗayan hanyoyin.
Shin wannan koyaushe gaskiya ne? Tabbas ba haka bane, amma idan kuna son tafiya tare da mafi kyawun faren ku don hana yaƙe-yaƙe, ku fitar da Ban Ki-Moonies da ƙungiyar mataimakansa. Mu a Amurka gabaɗaya muna yin watsi ko dariya a Kofi Annan, ko Boutrus Boutrus-Ghali. Wuraren da ba su da tasiri! Aika a cikin Marines.
Wata tatsuniya ta cije kura.
Yi tunani game da matrix na farashi/amfani. Da a ce za mu aika da Sakataren Harkokin Wajen Amurka James Baker ko watakila Sakatare Janar na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya Javier Pèrez de Cuèllar don mu'amala da Saddam Hussein a watan Agustan 1990 maimakon mu tashi tsaye don zuwa yaki? Wannan lokacin da aka yi don-diflomasiyya ne wanda zai iya guje wa Amurka 383 sun mutu, 467 Amurka sun ji rauni, Dala biliyan 102 a cikin kuɗaɗen Amurka da mafi ƙasƙanci ƙididdiga an kashe 'yan Iraqi kusan 20,000, rabinsu fararen hula. Madadin haka, George Bush da farko ya buge Saddam Afrilu Glaspie bumble, ba Saddam hasken kore na Amurka don mamaye Kuwait sannan nan take ya furta "Wannan ba zai tsaya ba,” fara ginawa sannan a kai hari. Duk mai yiwuwa gaba daya kaucewa.
Wannan shine ɗayan mafi ƙarancin yaƙe-yaƙe na Amurka, a cikin jini da taska. Idan da diflomasiyya za ta iya hana ko da yaki daya? Wannan bai cancanci ƙoƙari mai tsanani ba da gaske? Shin rayukan ɗan adam da ɗimbin kuɗin makamashi/kudi/kuɗaɗen albarkatu sun cancanci wani ƙoƙari mai tsanani daga jami'an diflomasiyya, ta masu shiga tsakani, ta kwararrun masu shiga tsakani? A fannina na Canjin Rikici koyaushe muna yin imani da hakan, kuma bincike yana ƙara tabbatar da hanyoyinmu sun fi yawa (sai dai idan kun kasance ribar yaki, ƙwararrun mutane waɗanda ke taimakawa wajen tsara saƙon kafofin watsa labarai cewa ba mu da wata alama, cewa magana ba ta da ƙarfi, kuma bama-bamai da mamayewa kawai ke aiki).
Shin ina adawa da manufofin yakin Amurka? Ee, zan faɗi haka, kuma hakan ya sa na zama maci amana kuma halaltacciyar manufa ta harin jirgin sama. a cewar wani farfesa a fannin shari'a na West Point. Shin zan faɗakar da abokan gidana? Jira — kawai ya ce malaman shari'a waɗanda ba su yarda ba su ne halalcin hari. Ni masanin zaman lafiya ne da rashin zaman lafiya, don haka har yanzu rashin amincewa na bai cancanci zama wanda ake so a yi niyya ba, a fili, ko kuma kawai ya ɗauka cewa malaman fafutuka irina sun kasance hari na halal.
Ya kamata in yi tambaya don ganin ko zan iya samun ɗan taimako daga Majalisar Dinkin Duniya kan wannan. Za a inganta damara, aƙalla bisa ga kimiyya.
Dokta Tom H. Hastings shi ne babban sakatare a cikin Ma'aikatar Resolution na Reshe a Jami'ar Jihar Portland kuma shi ne Mataimakin Daraktan PeaceVoice.
