Racists Love Russia?

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponPrint this page

By David Swanson

Photo by Daily Progress.

While I’ve been in Russia trying to make friends, back home in Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, a group of torch-bearing supporters of Robert E. Lee has held a rally generally understood as a proclamation of white supremacy. I’ve previously written at some length about this white identity group, their humanity, their legitimate grievances, and their support for Donald Trump.

They chanted: “You will not replace us!” possibly because the city of Charlottesville has decided to replace a statue of Robert E. Lee with something less racist.

They chanted: “Blood and soil!” I suppose to express their lengthy connection to the land (although their leader is no more from Virginia than Robert E. Lee is from Charlottesville), or — less charitably — just because of the flagrantly fascist sound of the slogan.

And they chanted: “Russia is our friend!”

If the relevance of that last one confuses you, I am very pleased to hear it.

To explain: In the United States many people identify as Democrats or Liberals, or Republicans or “Conservatives” on the other hand. What these identifications entail is infinitely manipulable by the corporate media and the powers that be in Washington, D.C. At the moment, one camp has come to mean:

Progressive,
Humanitarian,
Feminist,
Racially Inclusive,
Economically Fair,
Environmentalist,
Militarist,
And Hostile Toward Russia.

The other camp means:

Capitalist,
Regressive,
Sexist,
Racist,
Inhumane,
Destructive of the Environment,
Militarist,
And Friendly Toward Russia.

Both camps accept on the basis of no evidence whatsoever that Russia helped put Trump in the White House. Both camps are perfectly open to building up hostility toward a nuclear-armed government, but only one camp has been instructed to do so at this time for partisan reasons.

I mentioned this state of affairs to some Russians, and one replied: “But we never even had slavery, only serfdom.” Regardless of how important that distinction is, this misses the point. There’s no logical connection between liking Russia and wanting a city in 2017 to be dominated by confederate statues erected for racist campaigns in the 1920s. I’m not committing any fallacies by favoring some changes in Charlottesville’s landscape and favoring U.S.-Russia personal and governmental friendships.

I toured Moscow’s Gulag Museum today. I saw no crowd of gulag supporters proposing friendship with the United States. But such a display would hardly have been observable as such, since every single Russian I’ve ever met has proposed friendship with the United States — including Russians with a wide range of opinions about the gulags.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponPrint this page

9 Comments

  1. GreatLakeSailor says:

    May I republish this (and your other accounts of your trip) on the website caucus99percent.com?

  2. Alan R. Brown says:

    One can like the Russian people without liking Putin, just as one can like the American people without liking Trump.

  3. Alan R. Brown says:

    One can like the Russian people without liking Putin, just as one can like the American people without liking Trump!

  4. This article leaves me totally confused. I don’t quite know where to start, but there is plenty of evidence that Russian operatives have tried to manipulate the US elections to try to get Trump into power, just like it tried to manipulate the French elections. There clearly are efforts, in part traceable to Russia, that try to destabilise Western democracies and the EU and seem to want to feed right-wing extremism in the West.

    Then, I don’t know what is meant by “one camp has been instructed to do so at this time for partisan reasons.” Are you saying liberals are “instructing” other liberals to be against Russia? That makes no sense. And why the denigrating phrase “has been instructed”? You mean that no-one in that camp (whichever one it is, because even that’s not quite clear to me) is capable of independent thought?

    I suppose I identify with the liberal “camp,” but I am also a pacifist and support WorldBeyondWar and am all for friendship with the Russian people (though not necessarily its government). So where does that leave me? The reality is that there’s a lot of grey in both “camps.” And where does the distinction between slavery and serfdom fit in the narrative? I’m really utterly at a loss.

  5. I left a good message on in this box-it was erased because I wasn’t provided enough time to complete it.
    I hope you will change this time limit to allow for more complete and meaningful messages.
    Ramakumar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Translate »